top of page
  • Writer's picturePTA

What is HMRC Name and Shame Full Disclosure?

HMRC Name and Shame Full Disclosure: Overview and Current Practices

Introduction to HMRC's Name and Shame Policy

The HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) in the UK employs a "name and shame" strategy as part of its enforcement actions against tax non-compliance. This approach involves publicly listing individuals and businesses that have been found guilty of deliberate tax defaulting. The policy aims to deter tax evasion and encourage compliance by highlighting the consequences of failing to meet tax obligations.

What is HMRC Name and Shame Full Disclosure

Mechanics of the Name and Shame List

HMRC publishes details of those who have deliberately evaded taxes, including their names, addresses, and the nature of their defaults. This list is updated regularly and includes those who owe significant tax amounts or have incurred hefty penalties due to their fraudulent activities. The criteria for inclusion involve owing more than £25,000 in taxes. However, the list is not just a punitive measure but also serves as a public record, helping inform the public and protect the tax system's integrity.

Recent Trends and Examples

Recent entries to the list have included various entities, from small businesses to individuals across different sectors. For example, a takeaway restaurant in Luton was penalized heavily, reflecting HMRC's commitment to enforcing tax laws across all business sizes and types. The penalty was notably severe, amounting to nearly the total of the undeclared tax.

Scope and Impact of Naming and Shaming

The name and shame policy is not limited to direct tax evasion but also targets promoters of tax avoidance schemes. Under the Finance Act 2022, HMRC has enhanced powers to name not just the companies involved in avoidance schemes but also the individuals promoting these schemes. This is part of a broader government strategy to combat tax avoidance more effectively.

Public and Professional Reactions

The naming and shaming approach has received mixed reactions. While it is seen as an effective deterrent, there are concerns about the lack of due process and the potential for reputational damage that may not be proportional to the offence. Critics argue that the process could be seen as punitive beyond the financial penalties imposed, affecting the businesses' operations long after fines have been paid. Moreover, the focus on high street brands and the detailed breakdown of non-compliance areas suggest a strategic enforcement against visible and impactful targets.

HMRC's name and shame policy is a crucial part of the UK's strategy to ensure tax compliance and deter tax evasion and avoidance. By publicly listing defaulters, HMRC aims to reinforce the seriousness of these offences and encourage a culture of compliance. However, the approach continues to evolve, reflecting the balance between enforcement and fairness in the tax system.

HMRC's Legal Framework and the Challenges of Full Disclosure

Legal Basis for HMRC's Naming and Shaming

The legal framework for the HMRC’s name and shame policy primarily stems from the Finance Act 2004, which was later expanded by subsequent legislation including the Finance Act 2022. These acts grant HMRC the authority to publish details of those who fail to comply with tax laws, specifically targeting those involved in tax evasion or aggressive tax avoidance schemes. This policy is reinforced by HMRC's ability to use this information as a deterrent against potential defaulters and to maintain public confidence in the tax system.

Criteria and Process for Inclusion on the List

HMRC has strict criteria for including individuals and businesses on the name and shame list. The thresholds include owing significant amounts in unpaid taxes or being involved in egregious tax avoidance schemes. Once identified, these individuals and businesses are subject to an internal review process, ensuring that only those who meet the criteria are listed. This process also involves notifying the parties involved before they are publicly named, providing them an opportunity to correct their records and pay any outstanding taxes.

Challenges and Controversies

The name and shame policy has faced several challenges, particularly concerning due process and the rights of those listed. Some critics argue that the process may not always adhere to the principles of fairness and legality, especially when it leads to reputational damage without a full legal proceeding. Furthermore, there are cases where businesses and individuals have contested their inclusion on the list, sometimes leading to legal battles. These challenges highlight the tension between the need for effective tax enforcement and the protection of individual rights under the law.

High-Profile Cases and Legal Disputes

Recent high-profile cases have brought the name and shame policy under greater scrutiny. For instance, certain businesses have been named for substantial non-compliance with tax laws, involving millions in unpaid taxes. These cases often result in significant reputational damage and financial hardship for the businesses involved. Additionally, there have been instances where businesses have taken legal action against HMRC, arguing that the naming was unjustified or that it was done without adequate evidence. These disputes emphasize the complexities and potential consequences of the name and shame policy.

Impact on Compliance and Tax Collection

Despite the controversies, the name and shame policy has been effective in certain respects, particularly in improving compliance and deterring tax evasion. By making examples of non-compliant taxpayers, HMRC aims to send a strong message to the public about the importance of adhering to tax laws. The policy also plays a critical role in HMRC’s broader enforcement strategy, which includes audits, penalties, and other measures to ensure tax compliance.

The second part of our examination of HMRC's name and shame policy delves deeper into its legal underpinnings, the procedural aspects of naming tax defaulters, and the challenges that arise from this approach. The effectiveness of the policy in enhancing tax compliance, alongside the legal and ethical questions it raises, forms a crucial part of understanding how tax authorities enforce law and order within the fiscal domain. The final part of our article will explore the broader implications of this policy for taxpayers and the general public.

Broader Implications of HMRC's Name and Shame Policy

Effectiveness in Enhancing Tax Compliance

The HMRC's name and shame policy, intended as a deterrent against tax non-compliance, appears to be effective in certain regards. By publicly listing defaulters, it serves as a cautionary tale for businesses and individuals about the consequences of evading taxes. The potential for public embarrassment is significant and can lead to quicker resolutions of outstanding tax issues from those who wish to avoid being publicly named. This aspect of the policy aligns with HMRC's broader objectives to enhance overall tax compliance and increase revenue collection.

Economic and Social Impact

Being named on the HMRC list can have profound economic and social impacts on businesses and individuals. Economically, it may affect the ability of businesses to secure loans, attract investment, or maintain relationships with suppliers and customers. Socially, the stigma associated with being labeled a tax defaulter can damage reputations and lead to a loss of customer trust and business credibility. This dual impact underscores the name and shame approach as not just a regulatory tool but also a significant influencer of business practices and ethical standards.

Concerns about Fairness and Transparency

Despite its intended benefits, the name and shame policy raises concerns about fairness and transparency. Critics argue that the policy can sometimes be applied inconsistently and without sufficient transparency regarding how decisions are made. This lack of clarity can undermine trust in the tax system and potentially penalize businesses unfairly. Moreover, the absence of a full legal process in some cases before names are published could lead to claims of defamation and legal challenges from those who believe they have been wrongfully accused.

Future Directions and Improvements

Given the challenges and criticisms associated with the name and shame policy, there are calls for improvements in how HMRC implements this strategy. Suggestions include greater transparency in the criteria and processes used for naming individuals and businesses, better communication with those at risk of being named, and ensuring that all parties have adequate recourse to appeal against their inclusion on the list before publication. These improvements could help balance the need for effective tax enforcement with the rights and concerns of taxpayers.

The HMRC name and shame policy is a powerful tool in the UK's tax enforcement arsenal, designed to deter tax evasion and promote compliance. While effective in some respects, it also presents significant challenges related to fairness, transparency, and the economic and social impact on those named. As HMRC continues to refine its approach, focusing on these areas will be crucial to maintaining the integrity and effectiveness of the tax system, ensuring it operates justly and supports the principles of fairness and due process.

Consequences of Being on HMRC's Name and Shame List

The HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) "name and shame" list is a public declaration of individuals and businesses found guilty of significant tax defaulting in the UK. Being named on this list carries a range of serious consequences, spanning legal, financial, and reputational impacts. This detailed exploration focuses on understanding these ramifications and their broader effects on entities listed.

Financial Penalties and Tax Liabilities

One of the immediate consequences of appearing on the HMRC name and shame list is the imposition of financial penalties. These penalties are in addition to any back taxes owed and can be substantial. HMRC applies penalties based on the behavior that led to the tax underpayment, with deliberate tax evasion attracting higher penalties, sometimes up to 100% of the tax due. For example, businesses have faced penalties nearly equal to the undeclared tax, emphasizing the financial severity of non-compliance.

Increased Scrutiny and Audits

Entities listed on the name and shame list are likely to experience increased scrutiny from HMRC. This can include more frequent and detailed audits to ensure ongoing compliance. This increased attention can lead to significant administrative burdens and costs, as businesses must allocate more resources to managing their tax affairs and ensuring complete transparency in their financial reporting. The prospect of continual scrutiny serves as a deterrent, aiming to encourage better compliance practices among all taxpayers.

Reputational Damage

Perhaps the most far-reaching consequence of being named and shamed by HMRC is reputational damage. The public nature of the list means that the names of the entities are accessible not only to potential customers but also to investors, partners, and financial institutions. This exposure can erode trust and credibility, potentially leading to a loss of business, difficulty in securing financing, and strained business relationships. The reputational impact can be particularly devastating for small businesses and sole proprietors, whose local customer base may be highly sensitive to trust and integrity issues.

Impact on Business Operations

The consequences of being on the list can extend into various operational areas of a business. For instance, companies may find it challenging to attract and retain talent if potential employees are wary of associating with an organization known for tax evasion. Furthermore, vendors and suppliers might reconsider their terms or seek assurances against future risks, affecting supply chain stability and operational efficiency.

Legal Challenges and Disputes

Entities on the name and shame list may also face legal challenges. This can include disputes with HMRC over the accuracy of the tax assessments or the fairness of the penalties applied. Some businesses might engage in legal proceedings to contest their inclusion on the list, especially if they believe that due process was not followed. These legal battles can be costly and time-consuming, diverting attention from core business activities and leading to further financial strain.

Long-Term Financial Health

The combination of financial penalties, increased operational costs, potential loss of business, and legal expenses can have a cumulative effect on the financial health of a business. For some, this can lead to a downward spiral, affecting profitability and even leading to bankruptcy in extreme cases. The long-term financial impact can also deter future investments and expansion plans, stifling growth and innovation.

Being included on HMRC's name and shame list can have devastating consequences for individuals and businesses alike. The mix of financial penalties, increased regulatory scrutiny, reputational damage, and operational disruptions forms a significant deterrent against tax non-compliance. Entities aiming to avoid these repercussions must prioritize transparency, rigorous compliance, and regular engagements with tax advisors to navigate the complexities of UK tax law effectively. The broad implications of being named underscore the importance of maintaining robust tax compliance strategies to safeguard against both immediate penalties and long-term reputational harm.

How to Create an Effective Strategy to Get Off the HMRC Name and Shame List

Being listed on HMRC's "name and shame" list can have severe repercussions for businesses and individuals alike. If an entity finds itself on this list, it's crucial to take strategic steps not only to rectify the current situation but also to prevent future occurrences. The following strategies outline a comprehensive approach to addressing the issues that led to being named and improving overall compliance with tax obligations.

Immediate Response and Assessment

  • Understand the Reason for Inclusion: The first step in addressing inclusion on the list is to fully understand why it happened. This involves a detailed review of the HMRC’s report or notification to identify the specific reasons for the tax discrepancies or non-compliance.

  • Seek Professional Advice: Once the issues are identified, it’s advisable to consult with tax professionals or legal advisors who specialize in tax law and dispute resolution. These experts can provide guidance on the complexities of the issues and recommend an appropriate course of action.

Rectifying the Issues

  • Address the Tax Issues: Based on professional advice, take immediate steps to rectify any outstanding tax liabilities. This might involve filing amended returns, paying owed taxes, or both. It’s important to ensure that all filings are complete and accurate to avoid further issues with HMRC.

  • Engage with HMRC: Proactively engage with HMRC to discuss the situation. Demonstrating a willingness to correct the issues and comply with tax laws can be beneficial. This engagement should be documented thoroughly to keep a record of communications and resolutions.

Preventing Future Issues

  • Implement Robust Compliance Measures: To prevent future non-compliance, overhaul internal tax reporting and compliance procedures. Implementing more rigorous controls and regular audits can help ensure ongoing adherence to tax laws.

  • Educate Your Team: Conduct training sessions for all relevant staff on the importance of tax compliance and the specific practices that must be followed. Educating your team about the legal and financial implications of non-compliance is crucial for fostering a culture of adherence.

Rebuilding Reputation

  • Public Relations Strategy: After addressing the compliance issues, develop a public relations strategy to repair reputational damage. This might involve press releases, public statements, and community engagement to rebuild trust and confidence among stakeholders.

  • Transparent Communication: Maintain transparent communication with clients, suppliers, and partners about the steps taken to resolve the issues and ensure future compliance. Transparency can help rebuild trust and demonstrate commitment to ethical business practices.

Monitoring and Continuous Improvement

  • Regular Review and Audits: Establish regular review processes and audits to ensure that compliance measures are continuously followed and updated as necessary. Regular checks can prevent lapses and ensure that the business remains compliant with evolving tax laws.

  • Feedback Mechanism: Implement a system for feedback and reporting within the organization. Encourage employees to report any discrepancies or uncertainties regarding tax matters without fear of repercussions. A proactive approach can catch and address potential issues early.

Developing an effective strategy to remove an entity from HMRC’s name and shame list requires immediate and comprehensive action addressing both the specific issues that led to non-compliance and the systemic changes needed to ensure ongoing compliance. By taking these steps, businesses and individuals can not only rectify their standing with HMRC but also strengthen their operational procedures and reputational standing moving forward. This proactive and transparent approach is essential for maintaining the integrity and sustainability of any business operating under the rigorous scrutiny of tax authorities.

Case Study: Colin Redwood's Journey Off the HMRC Name and Shame List


Colin Redwood, a seasoned freelance graphic designer, found his business on the HMRC's name and shame list in early 2024. The listing was due to a misunderstanding and mishandling of his tax filings by a now-defunct payroll company, which failed to report his full income and incorrectly filed tax returns without his knowledge.

Initial Shock and Response

Upon discovering his name on the list, Colin experienced immediate reputational damage—losing two major clients and facing severe anxiety about his financial and professional future. He reached out to Pro Tax Accountant (PTA), a reputable tax firm known for assisting individuals in complex tax disputes.

Step-by-Step Strategy with PTA

  1. Comprehensive Review: PTA began by conducting a thorough review of Colin’s financial records and previous tax returns to identify discrepancies and the origin of the incorrect filings.

  2. Engagement with HMRC: With a clear understanding of the situation, PTA engaged directly with HMRC, presenting evidence that Colin had not intentionally evaded taxes but was misled by the payroll company. They provided detailed documentation showing Colin’s actual income versus what was reported.

  3. Negotiation for Penalty Reduction: PTA negotiated with HMRC to reduce the penalties originally imposed on Colin, arguing that he was cooperative and had taken swift action to rectify the situation.

  4. Settlement and Compliance: Colin agreed to a settlement that involved paying the corrected tax amount plus a reduced penalty. PTA also helped him set up a direct payment plan to manage these costs without crippling his business.

  5. Restorative Actions: To prevent future issues, PTA implemented a robust tax compliance framework for Colin, including quarterly reviews and the use of compliant accounting software that directly interfaces with HMRC’s systems.

  6. Reputation Management: Alongside the financial and legal strategies, PTA assisted Colin in drafting a public statement explaining the circumstances of his case, which was circulated to his clients and professional network. They also guided him in engaging a PR firm to help restore his professional image.


Within six months, Colin's proactive steps and PTA’s interventions led to his removal from the HMRC name and shame list. His business gradually recovered, securing new contracts and restoring confidence among his clients. The experience underscored the importance of accurate tax reporting and the value of professional advice in navigating tax disputes.

Financial Implications

The total financial impact on Colin included the back taxes, reduced penalties, and professional fees for PTA and the PR firm, amounting to approximately £30,000. However, this was seen as a necessary investment to save his business and professional reputation.


This case study highlights the critical role of choosing reliable payroll services and the effectiveness of engaging with skilled tax professionals when confronting tax issues. It also illustrates the potential for recovery and reinstatement of one's professional standing through diligent and transparent actions.

How a Tax Accountant Can Assist in Removing Your Name from HMRC's Name and Shame List

How a Tax Accountant Can Assist in Removing Your Name from HMRC's Name and Shame List

Being listed on the HMRC's "name and shame" list can have significant negative consequences for individuals and businesses alike. A tax accountant can play a crucial role in navigating the complexities of tax law and the specific requirements of HMRC to help remove a name from this list. Here’s how a tax accountant can assist:

Detailed Assessment and Review

A tax accountant will start by conducting a thorough review of your financial records and past tax returns. This is crucial to understand the nature of the discrepancies that led to being named on the list. They can identify errors, whether these were due to oversight, misinterpretation of tax laws, or failure of previous tax advisors. This step is essential to formulating a strategy for rectifying the issue with HMRC.

Communication with HMRC

Tax accountants are experienced in dealing with HMRC and can navigate its systems effectively. They can act as an intermediary to communicate with HMRC on your behalf. This includes explaining the situation, submitting necessary documentation, and clarifying any misunderstandings. Their expertise ensures that communication is clear, professional, and adheres to legal standards, which can significantly speed up the process of resolving the issue.

Negotiation and Resolution

In cases where penalties have been applied, a tax accountant can negotiate with HMRC to potentially reduce these penalties based on mitigating factors, such as a good previous tax compliance record or quick action to remedy the fault. They understand the intricacies of tax law and can argue effectively for a fair assessment of your situation.

Compliance Assurance

Tax accountants can help ensure ongoing compliance to prevent future issues. They can set up robust accounting systems and controls that automatically comply with current tax laws and regulations. This not only helps in staying off the list in the future but also in managing your tax liabilities more efficiently.

Strategic Tax Planning

Beyond addressing the immediate issue, tax accountants provide strategic advice on tax planning to optimize tax positions legally. This includes advice on structuring transactions, investments, and other financial decisions in a way that minimizes tax liabilities within the bounds of the law.

Regular Updates and Monitoring

Tax laws and regulations can change frequently. A tax accountant keeps abreast of these changes and can advise on the implications for your business or personal tax affairs. Regular updates from your accountant can help you make informed decisions and maintain compliance.

Educational Guidance

A tax accountant can also educate you and your staff on best practices for tax compliance. This is particularly important for businesses to ensure that all employees understand the tax implications of their actions and the importance of maintaining accurate records.

Documentation and Record Keeping

Proper documentation and record keeping are essential to defend against any future disputes with HMRC. A tax accountant can help establish a systematic approach to record keeping that meets legal requirements and supports the accuracy of tax returns.

Restoration of Reputation

After resolving the issues with HMRC, a tax accountant can also advise on steps to restore your financial reputation. This might include public relations strategies and transparent communication with stakeholders to rebuild trust.

Prevention of Future Issues

Finally, a tax accountant plays a key role in preventing the recurrence of issues that could lead to being named on the HMRC list again. This includes regular tax reviews, audits, and the implementation of compliance checks that align with HMRC’s expectations.

In conclusion, the support of a knowledgeable tax accountant is invaluable in dealing with and resolving issues related to HMRC's name and shame list. Their expertise not only helps in addressing the immediate problems but also sets a foundation for better tax management and compliance in the future, safeguarding your financial and professional integrity.


Q1: How long does a business or individual typically remain on the HMRC name and shame list?

A: The duration on the HMRC name and shame list generally depends on the severity of the tax default and the corrective actions taken by the entity. HMRC reviews and updates the list periodically, removing entities that have resolved their issues and complied with tax obligations.

Q2: Are there any specific industries more frequently targeted by HMRC for inclusion on the name and shame list?

A: HMRC does not target specific industries; however, sectors with complex tax structures or high levels of cash transactions, such as construction, retail, and hospitality, may appear more frequently due to the complexities and opportunities for tax non-compliance.

Q3: Can inclusion on the HMRC name and shame list impact a company’s ability to bid for public contracts?

A: Yes, being named on this list can impact a company's eligibility to bid for public contracts, as it affects their reputation and can be seen as a risk factor by public sector entities.

Q4: What legal recourse do entities have if they believe they were wrongly included on the HMRC name and shame list?

A: Entities that believe they have been wrongly included can challenge their inclusion through appeals to HMRC or by seeking judicial review if necessary, arguing against the merits of their case or the process followed.

Q5: Does HMRC provide a warning before placing an entity on the name and shame list?

A: Yes, HMRC typically provides a notice to the entity detailing the reasons for potential inclusion on the list, offering an opportunity to rectify the issues before the list is published.

Q6: How can entities monitor whether they are at risk of being placed on the name and shame list?

A: Entities should regularly consult with tax advisors, conduct internal audits, and stay updated on their tax compliance status to monitor any potential risks of being placed on the list.

Q7: Are individuals and small businesses treated differently than large corporations when being placed on the name and shame list?

A: HMRC applies the same criteria for inclusion on the list regardless of the size of the business; however, the impact and corrective measures might differ significantly between large corporations and smaller entities.

Q8: How does HMRC calculate the penalties for those listed on the name and shame list?

A: Penalties are calculated based on the severity of the tax default, the amount of tax owed, and whether the default was perceived as deliberate or due to negligence.

Q9: What are the most common reasons for businesses ending up on the HMRC name and shame list?

A: Common reasons include underreporting income, overstating deductions, failing to file tax returns, and participating in tax avoidance schemes.

Q10: Can an entity’s inclusion on the name and shame list be publicly contested or debated?

A: While the factual basis for inclusion can be contested through legal channels, the public discussion or debate about an entity's inclusion is generally limited to commentary and does not impact HMRC’s decision directly.

Q11: What are the immediate steps an entity should take upon finding out they are on the name and shame list?

A: Immediate steps should include reviewing the HMRC’s claims, consulting with a tax advisor, and beginning the process of rectifying any discrepancies or filing overdue returns.

Q12: How often is the HMRC name and shame list updated?

A: The list is updated periodically, typically annually or biannually, as HMRC reviews and revises the entries based on new information or resolutions of past issues.

Q13: What impact does the name and shame policy have on the overall tax compliance of businesses?

A: The name and shame policy aims to increase overall tax compliance by raising awareness about the consequences of tax evasion and by deterring other entities from engaging in similar behaviors.

Q14: Are there any specific compliance programs recommended by HMRC to avoid being placed on the name and shame list?

A: HMRC recommends regular tax audits, accurate and timely tax filings, and the use of approved accounting practices as part of comprehensive compliance programs to avoid non-compliance issues.

Q15: What are the implications for international businesses operating in the UK when they are placed on the name and shame list?

A: International businesses may face additional scrutiny both in the UK and their home countries, potentially affecting their global operations and reputation.

Q16: How can tax advisors assist entities on the name and shame list?

A: Tax advisors can help by providing expert advice on resolving compliance issues, negotiating with HMRC, and implementing strategies to prevent future non-compliance.

Q17: Is there a public database of all entities ever named on the HMRC list, and can it be accessed by the public?

A: HMRC maintains a public record of the name and shame list on their website, which can beaccessed by the public to verify the inclusion of any entity over time.

Q18: Can an entity voluntarily remove itself from the HMRC name and shame list by self-correcting before HMRC's intervention?

A: Self-correction before formal HMRC intervention can prevent inclusion on the list, but once listed, formal resolution and compliance are required to be removed from future updates.

Q19: What role do public perceptions play in the effectiveness of the HMRC name and shame list?

A: Public perception plays a significant role as the threat of reputational damage is a key deterrent; the fear of losing customer trust and facing public scrutiny encourages compliance.

Q20: Are there any specific HMRC outreach or educational programs aimed at helping businesses understand their tax obligations to avoid being named and shamed?

A: HMRC offers various outreach and educational programs, including workshops, webinars, and guidance documents, to help businesses understand their tax obligations and ensure compliance to avoid issues that could lead to being named on the list.


Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page